Tuesday, August 30, 2016

My last post focused on some comparisons of 2015 versus 2016 for Raccoon River nitrate. As part of updating that data, I decided to also update some of my nitrogen budget data for the watershed. Inputs of nitrogen into the watershed include fertilizer and manure N, deposition from rainfall, and fixation of N by legumes. Outputs of nitrogen are loss of nitrate to denitrification in the soil, export of nitrogen in the harvested grain, vaporization of nitrogen gases (N2, N2O and NO and ammonia gas-NH3) to the atmosphere, and finally, loss of N to the stream network. Some of these things are easy to quantify or estimate: rainfall deposition, grain N, and river N. Denitrification and vaporization are difficult because they vary with soil type and weather. Fertilizer and manure N can be estimated, but hard, credible data is scarce. Legume fixation can be credibly estimated, but is known to vary and there is uncertainty in the estimates.

I haven’t competed all of my budget, but I do have river N loads and grain N export and these numbers for 2015 are interesting. Firstly, more nitrogen left the watershed in the grain in 2015 than in any year dating back to 1995, indicating a robust harvest. The conventional wisdom usually is that good harvests are good for water quality (and bad harvests bad for water quality), because the crop was able to access the needed nutrients, leaving fewer nutrients on the landscape that are vulnerable to transport. However, 2015 was a bucket of cold water on that idea, as river N load was the biggest ever dating back to 1974. The second half of the year had an especially large river N load (see 8/18/16 blog post).

What this shows us is how exposed, vulnerable and unpredictable this production system is to N loss in Iowa’s climate. I think it is difficult for most people to grasp the enormity of solving this problem without negatively affecting crop yields. While degraded water quality due to nutrient pollution is probably not our most pressing societal problem, we should see it as a sign that the resilience and sustainability of our production system is an open question.

The table below shows nitrogen exports in the grain and river going back to 1995. All units are metric tons (or million grams, symbolized by Mg).

All units are Mg
year corn yield soy yield N removed in corn grain N removed in Soy grain total N removed in grain River N Load
1995 3,040,000 1,040,000 31,000 57,700 88,800 18,570
1996 3,370,000 1,070,000 34,400 59,500 93,900 19,715
1997 3,080,000 1,070,000 31,400 59,800 91,200 12,730
1998 3,210,000 1,070,000 32,700 59,300 92,000 27,110
1999 3,390,000 1,010,000 34,500 56,400 91,000 30,326
2000 3,270,000 922,000 33,400 51,300 84,700 1,099
2001 3,160,000 1,030,000 32,200 57,400 89,600 16,769
2002 3,650,000 1,110,000 37,200 62,000 99,200 11,839
2003 3,540,000 759,000 36,100 42,300 78,300 16,376
2004 4,360,000 1,070,000 44,500 59,700 104,000 18,968
2005 4,240,000 1,150,000 43,200 63,800 107,000 12,969
2006 3,740,000 1,040,000 38,200 58,000 96,200 9,309
2007 4,510,000 967,000 46,000 53,800 99,800 31,445
2008 4,330,000 951,000 44,200 52,900 97,100 25,688
2009 4,630,000 1,020,000 47,300 56,800 104,000 16,598
2010 4,210,000 991,000 43,000 55,200 98,200 31,753
2011 4,620,000 991,000 47,200 55,200 102,000 13,249
2012 3,400,000 736,000 34,700 41,000 75,700 2,333
2013 3,630,000 722,000 37,000 40,200 77,200 25,725
2014 4,620,000 1,020,000 47,100 56,600 104,000 21,919
2015 4,760,000 1,140,000 48,500 63,500 112,000 47,456